rada

[jurash]

tak sem si dal tu praci a nasel sem nejaky fotky gti6 ze spoda:

http://www.306gti6.com/forum/showthread ... 940&page=1

necham si rad od zkusenejsich vysvetlit, cim se naprava gti6 lisi od napravy z "bezne" 306 (obrazky pro porovnani napriklak na odkaze o 309 o par prispevku vys), a cim to tedy je, ze je nataceci pouze gti6..

[rossi]

Jak to neni v me 205ce tak je to nanic a na hov..

[Stephen]

Jurash: tu napravu nataceci mela opravdu jen 306 GTi6!

[jurash]

ok to rikate vsichni, ale nikdo neni s to vysvetlit v cem to nataceni spociva. svou verzi jsem napsal (tzn diky geometrii drzaku, tzn pasivni nataceni napravy proti smeru zataceni, coz dela mirnou pretacivost aby se eliminovala nedotacivost dana konstrukci "vsechno vepredu"), tak cekam, ze mi ji teda nekdo vyvrati. zajima me taky, kde se vzalo to dogma ze ji ma nataceci jen gti6 (kdyz je pritom uplne stejna, vcetne uchytnych bodu). ze se o nataceni psalo v souvislosti s gti6, to ano, ale to samo o sobe nic neznamena..

edit:
Wiki je sice otevrenej zdroj, ale..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peugeot_306

"Chassis design"

The PSA powertrains, described above, drove the front wheels of a chassis with a seemingly conventional design. At the front was a standard McPherson strut layout with anti-roll bar, while the rear used a semi-independent trailing arm/torsion bar set up. However, Peugeot's chassis engineers employed some unusual features, including passive rear wheel steering (by means of specially designed compliance bushes in the rear suspension), and in-house developed and constructed shock absorbers. The diesel and larger capacity petrol engines are canted as far back as possible in the engine bay in an effort to put as much weight as possible behind the front axle line, improving weight distribution, and minimising understeer. The 306 was regarded as the best handling small family car of its time.

..nikde ani zminka o tom ze by to mela pouze GTi6 nebo s16...